Review: 2013 Honda Accord EX

Our last look at the Accord was back in September when we
ran a two-parter (part 1, part 2) after being invited to the
launch event. Yes, shockingly our invite wasn’t lost in the mail. As TTAC has
said in the past, there are problems with launch events. Usually you’re running
around in a pre-production car that may not be “quite right” yet, you have to
split your driving time with some dude from another publication (shout out to
Hooniverse on that trip).  Drive time is limited, and exclusively done on
roads selected by the manufacturer. Sometimes you don’t get the trim level you
want either. What I wanted was one step up from the base model,
the mainstream EX and I wanted it on the same roads I’ve driven the other
Camcord competitors. Here’s that review.

Exterior

Honda has long been known as a serious kind of Car Company.
Press events are orderly, the Honda folks wear suits and their products are
similarly starched. While we have a new corporate nose up front with a chrome
“smiley” face and aggressive headlamps, the rest of the profile is buttoned up
and professional. The large (and low) greenhouse says “I have kids,” an image
that Honda has been embracing with their latest commercials, essentially
admitting they are leaving descriptives like “sexy” and “dramatic” to Hyundai
and Ford. I have to admit I am quite torn, I love the Fusion’s sexy sheetmetal
making it my first pick in terms of looks, but oddly enough the “plain Jane”
Accord is number two for me because it’s simple clean. The new Kia Optima is a
very, very close third thanks its nose job for 2014. I’m not convinced that the
Camry’s nose or the Sonata’s dramatic character lines will age well, let me
know what you think in the comment section. Something important to keep in mind
is the Accord has bucked the growth trend and has shrunk on the outside
compared to the previous generation making it among the smallest in this
segment. Good if you live in the city, bad if you were hoping for a Honda land
yacht.

Typical
for Honda, the Accord has no factory installed options to choose from, you
simply pick your trim: LX, EX, Sport EX-L, or Touring. LX, EX and Sport models
can be had with a manual or a CVT while EX-L and Touring models are CVT only
with the four cylinder and auto only with the V6. Aside from the lack of fog
lights in the LX and a tiny bit of black trim on the LX and EX models, the only
visual clues to which Accord you’re driving are the wheels and exhaust tips.
When it comes to sleepers, there’s nothing that fits that description like an
Accord.

Interior

Honda’s interiors have long been known for their simple
functionality rather than opulence or elegance and Honda is still singing the
same tune. Despite being an all-new model for 2013, Honda hasn’t radically
changed the interior design, opting instead for incremental improvements and
more standard features. All Accords now get standard dual-zone automatic
climate control, Bluetooth phone integration, a backup cam and active noise
cancellation. Honda seems to have listened to the complaints from reviewers and
customers and took a methodical and dedicated approach to making the Accord
quieter on the road. In addition to the fancy noise cancelling software,
there’s more foam, more carpet and a one-piece dash designed to prevent squeaks
later in life.

Honda’s
seat engineers seem to be designing seats specifically for my back lately. The
Accord and the refreshed Civic both sport supportive seats that coddled by back
and backside on long journeys. There is a caution I must toss in however, the
lumbar support in Sport, EX and LX models is fixed and pronounced. If you need
some adjustability in your back support, you’ll need to step up to a leather
model to get it. 2013 has brought a raft of materials improvements to the
Accord cabin from improved seat fabrics to more squishy dash bits and the
ever-so-popular stitched pleather. Thankfully Honda spares potential owners the
shame of faux wood trim, instead opting for a modern brown pattern that I found
attractive. The trim and the style are not as stylized or futuristic as the
competition, but controls are easy to locate, and consistent in their high
quality feel.

Thanks to the Accord’s upright profile, getting in and out
of the back seats is an easy task, something I can’t say of the Fusion. Once
inside the height pays further dividends with more headroom than the coupé-like
competitors. Despite being smaller on the outside and having a smaller
wheelbase than the outgoing model, legroom is up by a welcome 1.3 inches in the
rear and the trunk has grown to a [finally] competitive 13.7 cubic feet. On the
down side, Honda forgot that sometimes people need to carry large items and
three people, not possible in the Accord if you fold down the rear seat
since it folds as a single unit.

Even
base model Accords are well equipped with dual-zone climate control, auto
headlamps, cruise control, backup camera, and a one-touch up/down window for
the driver. Because of the comfortable seats and high level of standard
gadgets, the Accord is the poster child of “easy to live with” like that
comfortable sweatshirt.

Infotainment

Honda’s relentless drive to streamline options means a high
level of standard tech on the Accord. All Accords get an 8-inch high-res screen
in the middle of the dash, Bluetooth integration for speakerphone and audio,
iDevice/USB interface, Pandora internet radio app integration and SMS messaging
features if your smartphone supports it. (At the time of our drive, Pandora
radio is restricted to Apple iDevices and SMS messaging to Android devices,
Honda giveth and taketh away.)

Browsing
the lots of my nearest Honda dealers, it seems the EX and EX-L models account
for the bulk of purchases and lot space, not surprising since they straddle the
middle in terms of price from $24,605 for a manual EX to $32,070 foe an EX-L
V6. All EX models get keyless entry/go, Honda’s up-level audio system and their
Lane Watch blind-spot viewing system. (Trust me, LW is more exciting than it
sounds). Stepping up to the EX-L model or above gets you a higher resolution
8-inch screen and a 5-inch touchscreen LCD in the center of the
dash that acts as the primary audio control interface. The addition of the
second display allows you to see some audio information at the same time as the
8-inch display either shows you the navigation screen (if you’ve opted for it)
or some other information source. Want to know more? Check out that video
above.

Drivetrain

I know we’re here to dream of EarthDreams (which is quite
possibly the worst thing anyone has ever named an engine family), but we should
start out with that optional V6.  As before the V6 has cylinder
deactivation tech, but Honda decided that the old system which would cut out 2 or
3 cylinders depending on the load was more trouble than it was worth, so for
2013 the V6 will only drop to 3 cylinders but the range of operation has been
expanded. Thanks to the tweaks and a new 6-speed automatic, the V6 is good for
278HP and 252 lb-ft of torque while delivering 21/34MPG. The V6 has a
well-tuned exhaust note and scoots to 60 in the same 6.2 seconds that the
Altima 3.5 managed, but the Accord lags the Altima in real-world fuel economy
by 3 MPG. This isn’t the engine you want.

What
piqued my interest at the launch event was Honda’s new 2.4L direct-injection
four cylinder engine. The engine and new CVT turned my impression of the Accord
on its head. The engine’s 185HP still arrive at a very-Honda high RPM of
6,500, but thanks to the direct-injection sauce torque jumps to a [nearly] HP
matching 181 lb-ft with a strong pull from idle and a peak at a decidedly
un-Honda 3,900RPM. If you choose the 6-speed manual, you no longer have to rev
the nuts off the engine to get the Accord in motion. Most shoppers however will
findP a Continuously Variable Transmission under their Accord’s hood, although
they may not even notice. Why? This is quite possibly the world’s best CVT.

Yes, I know I have a rep for the
love-that-dare-not-speak-its-name, but I have my reasons for liking a CVT: fuel
economy, mountain climbing, and maximizing acceleration in underpowered cars
like the 107HP Versa. This CVT is actually pleasant to drive. I’m not sure how
the boffins managed it, but Honda’s new CVT switches ratios quickly and crisply
with a feel that is so close to a standard automatic the average person might
not be able to tell the difference. If you have driven a Nissan with a CVT, you
get what some call a “rubber band” feeling that pressing the throttle gets
instant response but builds, levels, then after you release the throttle it
takes a while for the engine to “return” to a dull roar.

The
Accord on the other hand has the feeling of a downshift where the engine shifts
to a high RPM almost immediately, then like a normal CVT, stays there while you
accelerate and when you lift it drops rapidly like a normal transmission
upshifting. Passengers in the car were confused, some thought they detected
shifts and thought it was an auto, while a few realized it was just a good CVT.
This is as it should be. If you need another reason to give the CVT a shot, the
27 city, 36 highway and 30 combined MPG rating should make a believer out of
you. In my mixed driving I averaged a stout 32.5 MPG. If you absolutely must
have the manual, you’ll be limited to four-cylinder LX, EX and Sport models
(the V6/MT combo is Accord coupé specific). The manual will save you $1,200 at
the register but cost you more at the pump with fuel economy dropping to 24/34
and in my testing the combined number was some 5MPG lower than the CVT.

The Accord has long been known for its double wishbone front
suspension, a design that some prefer because of increasing negative camber
gain as the suspension reaches the end of travel. On the downside it’s heavier,
more expensive and according to Honda contributed to the NVH that owners and
reviewers whined about. What does that have to do with anything? The wishbone
is gone, replaced by a MacPherson strut arrangement like just about every other
FWD car in the USA. Does it matter? Not really, most people would be hard
pressed to tell the difference since the Accord is hardly a track day car. Or
is it?

The
mid-size sedan is the ultimate comprise car, just watch a sedan add some time.
They are supposed to schlep the kids to daycare and then carve that canyon on
your way to your impressive day job where everyone congratulates you on making
the smart decision to buy the family car instead of the Mercedes roadster.
Truth be told, any mid-size sedan carves corners with shocking aplomb, holds at
least two car seats with ease, looks good enough to valet park and manages to
keep from breaking the bank. You know, except for that Dodge Avenger I’m trying
to forget. But I digress.

Honda made a big deal out of the weight reduction at the
launch event, but in truth the 3,336lb curb weight merely represents a tend in
the right direction and lands the Accord in the middle of the fray. What is
different is how Honda chose to tune the Accord. Out on the road the steering
is moderately heavy with a hint of feedback (more than can be said for most
sedans these days) and the suspension is firm for a family car. The combination
create a feel that I would almost describe as “Germanic,” something that
paradoxically cannot be said of the latest Passat. When the feel and suspension
are mated with 215/55R17 rubber on the EX and EX-L models, the Accord can dance
with the best of the competition. The Sport model’s 235 width tires might sound
attractive but beware, the rubber is bundled with new steering stops that
increase the turning circle from good to enormous. My suggestion would be to
buy a regular model, jump to 225s and deal with the occasional rubbing.

Thanks
to a combination of excellent road manners, a surprisingly quick 6.8 second
jump to 60 and the best mid-sized non-hybrid/non-diesel fuel economy we have
tested so far and the Accord EX becomes my favorite four-cylinder mid-size
sedan. It’s not as sexy as the Fusion, but it’s cheaper by a nose, more
exciting than a Camry, more mainstream than a Kia or Hyundai (yes, I did use
that as a factor because you know shoppers will) and statistically more
reliable than some of the other options on the road. There’s always a “but” and
here it is: the Altima 3.5 starts at $25,760, weighs the same as the
four-cylinder Accord, clears 60 in 5.5 seconds and averaged a shocking (and
totally worth it) 27.6 MPG during our week.

Hit it

The best CVT ever created.

Our average fuel economy was only 1MPG lower
than a Civic.

Excellent chassis dynamics.

Quit it

Lane Watch is as gimmicky as it sounds.

You have to upgrade to the EX-L to avoid the
urethane steering wheel.

I still don’t understand the split screen
radio/nav situation. Someone explain that to me over a beer.

Honda provided the vehicle,
insurance and gas for this review

Specifications as tested

0-30: 2.8 Seconds

0-60: 6.83 Seconds

1/4 Mile: 15.25 Seconds @ 93 MPH

Average Observed Fuel Economy:
32.5MPG over 659 miles

Source:
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2013/05/review-2013-honda-accord-ex-video/#more-487583